A critical exploration of adaptation heuristics

A large body of knowledge has been evolving to guide efforts in how we adapt climate change. This is underpinned by a set standardised rules thumb (heuristics) that define what adaptation and it means. For example, widely accepted local issue best achieved urgent anticipatory action using participatory processes. Yet, the validity relevance these heuristics have rarely tested or questioned. If are not based on sound empirical evidence, their inclusion use scientific studies, policy development, planning implementation processes can generate inappropriate solutions for highly complex problems. research critically examines tests common investigates extent which they correspond with lived experiences practitioners who engaged Queensland, Australia. The findings provide new insights into applicability heuristics, point several underpin practice. was mainly seen as regional/transboundary broader stakeholder involvement pursued through an incremental ‘learn-as-we-go’ approach. Retaining flexibility policy- decision-making systems preferred were no-regret, value- risk-based approaches. Future needed explore further different types support science, policy,